linux-kernel - Re: [RFC: 2.6.19 patch] let PCI_MULTITHREAD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061027012058.GH5591@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:20:58 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6.19 patch] let PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE depend on BROKEN

On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 03:02:52AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE is an interesting feature, but in it's current 
> state it seems to be more of a trap for users who accidentally
> enable it.
> 
> This patch lets PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE depend on BROKEN for 2.6.19.
> 
> The intention is to get this patch reversed in -mm as soon as it's in 
> Linus' tree, and reverse it for 2.6.20 or 2.6.21 after the fallout of 
> in-kernel problems PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE causes got fixed.

People who enable features clearly marked as EXPERIMENTAL deserve what
they get, IMO.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/