[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061026182838.ac2c7e20.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:28:38 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6.19 patch] let PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE depend on BROKEN
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:20:58 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 03:02:52AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE is an interesting feature, but in it's current
> > state it seems to be more of a trap for users who accidentally
> > enable it.
> >
> > This patch lets PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE depend on BROKEN for 2.6.19.
> >
> > The intention is to get this patch reversed in -mm as soon as it's in
> > Linus' tree, and reverse it for 2.6.20 or 2.6.21 after the fallout of
> > in-kernel problems PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE causes got fixed.
>
> People who enable features clearly marked as EXPERIMENTAL deserve what
> they get, IMO.
It's not the impact on "people" which is of concern - it's the impact on
kernel developers - specifically those who spend time looking at bug
reports :(
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists