[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061028213918.GE27968@stusta.de>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 23:39:18 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, toralf.foerster@....de,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
link@...gy.org, greg@...ah.com, akpm@...l.org,
zippel@...ux-m68k.org, torvalds@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usbnet: use MII hooks only if CONFIG_MII is enabled
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 02:10:09PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 28 October 2006 4:21 am, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > This is really awkward and against what we do in any other driver.
>
> Awkward, yes -- which is why I posted the non-awkward version,
> which is repeated below. (No thanks to "diff" for making the
> patch ugly though; the resulting code is clean and non-awkward,
> moving that function helped.)
>...
> --- g26.orig/drivers/usb/net/usbnet.c 2006-10-24 18:29:28.000000000 -0700
> +++ g26/drivers/usb/net/usbnet.c 2006-10-25 19:07:16.000000000 -0700
> @@ -669,6 +669,9 @@ done:
> * they'll probably want to use this base set.
> */
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_MII) || defined(CONFIG_MII_MODULE)
> +#define HAVE_MII
>...
This seems to cause a CONFIG_USB_USBNET=y, CONFIG_MII=m breakage
(as already described earlier in this thread)?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists