[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061028064924.GA9127@hockin.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 23:49:24 -0700
From: thockin@...kin.org
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@...giomb.no-ip.org>,
Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: AMD X2 unsynced TSC fix?
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:46:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 23:35:24 -0700
> thockin@...kin.org wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:06:12PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > > So far, has I can understand. Seems to me that my computer which have a
> > > > Pentium D (Dual Core) on VIA chipset, also have unsynchronized TSC and
> > > > with the patch of hrtimers on
> > >
> > > Intel systems (except for some large highend systems) have synchronized TSCs.
> >
> > Does Intel guarantee that, or is that just what we happen to see, so far.
>
> Matthias has a Xeon machine on which the TSCs are unsynced, and which are
> unsyncable - write_tsc() just doesn't do anything. See thread at
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/22/104
Nothing at all, or just the the low few bits are writeable? I had heard,
but never seen that some Intel CPUs only allowed 16 bits of writable bits
in the TSC MSR. I also heard of, but never saw, CPUs that cleared the TSC
to 0 on a write!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists