linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: spin_lock_irqsave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061030132714.GB1657@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:27:14 +0100
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...os.cz>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: spin_lock_irqsave_nested()

On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 02:12:41PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> Here are some doubts...
...
> On 30-10-2006 10:03, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> > Subject: spin_lock_irqsave_nested()
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(_spin_lock_irqsave_nested);
> >  
> >  #endif
> >  
> > 
> 
> Shouldn't this _nested locks be considered in: 
> #else /* CONFIG_PREEMPT: */
> part?

Sorry, this one is not my doubt anymore.

Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/