[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1162215648.24143.186.camel@taijtu>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:40:48 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...os.cz>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: spin_lock_irqsave_nested() -v2
*sigh*, I truly am cursed today :-(
how about this...
---
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: spin_lock_irqsave_nested()
Introduce spin_lock_irqsave_nested(); implementation from:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/1/122
Patch from:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/13/258
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...os.cz>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
include/linux/spinlock.h | 6 ++++++
include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h | 2 ++
kernel/spinlock.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ void __lockfunc _read_lock_irq(rwlock_t
void __lockfunc _write_lock_irq(rwlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock);
unsigned long __lockfunc _spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock)
__acquires(lock);
+unsigned long __lockfunc _spin_lock_irqsave_nested(spinlock_t *lock, int subclass)
+ __acquires(lock);
unsigned long __lockfunc _read_lock_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock)
__acquires(lock);
unsigned long __lockfunc _write_lock_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/spinlock.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/spinlock.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -186,10 +186,16 @@ do { \
#define spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) flags = _spin_lock_irqsave(lock)
#define read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) flags = _read_lock_irqsave(lock)
#define write_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) flags = _write_lock_irqsave(lock)
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+#define spin_lock_irqsave_nested(lock, flags, subclass) flags = _spin_lock_irqsave_nested(lock, subclass)
+#else
+#define spin_lock_irqsave_nested(lock, flags, subclass) flags = _spin_lock_irqsave(lock)
+#endif
#else
#define spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) _spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)
#define read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) _read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)
#define write_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) _write_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)
+#define spin_lock_irqsave_nested(lock, flags, subclass) _spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)
#endif
#define spin_lock_irq(lock) _spin_lock_irq(lock)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/spinlock.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/spinlock.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/spinlock.c
@@ -294,6 +294,28 @@ void __lockfunc _spin_lock_nested(spinlo
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_spin_lock_nested);
+unsigned long __lockfunc _spin_lock_irqsave_nested(spinlock_t *lock, int subclass)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ preempt_disable();
+ spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
+ /*
+ * On lockdep we dont want the hand-coded irq-enable of
+ * _raw_spin_lock_flags() code, because lockdep assumes
+ * that interrupts are not re-enabled during lock-acquire:
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_SPIN_LOCKING
+ _raw_spin_lock(lock);
+#else
+ _raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, &flags);
+#endif
+ return flags;
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(_spin_lock_irqsave_nested);
+
#endif
void __lockfunc _spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists