lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <17859287641876623669@karneval.cz>
Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:42:06 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	<support@...cialix.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] Char: sx, remove unneeded stuff

sx, remove unneeded stuff

remove #if 0's and commented code. We have version control for this purpose.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>

---
commit 10fd13e67b848584d1553b524d2e925ad60a1b4f
tree 6a6750db2865877d6c7c31a5f8406e53e79af787
parent b7dbf65a81c1707405982cb66aa5df5a9ada464e
author Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com> Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:43:11 +0100
committer Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com> Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:43:11 +0100

 drivers/char/sx.c |  132 -----------------------------------------------------
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/sx.c b/drivers/char/sx.c
index 7395c13..fe5fabb 100644
--- a/drivers/char/sx.c
+++ b/drivers/char/sx.c
@@ -252,29 +252,6 @@ #endif
 /* Am I paranoid or not ? ;-) */
 #undef SX_PARANOIA_CHECK
 
-/* 20 -> 2000 per second. The card should rate-limit interrupts at 100
-   Hz, but it is user configurable. I don't recommend going above 1000
-   Hz. The interrupt ratelimit might trigger if the interrupt is
-   shared with a very active other device. */
-#define IRQ_RATE_LIMIT 20
-
-/* Sharing interrupts is possible now. If the other device wants more
-   than 2000 interrupts per second, we'd gracefully decline further
-   interrupts. That's not what we want. On the other hand, if the
-   other device interrupts 2000 times a second, don't use the SX
-   interrupt. Use polling. */
-#undef IRQ_RATE_LIMIT
-
-#if 0
-/* Not implemented */
-/* 
- * The following defines are mostly for testing purposes. But if you need
- * some nice reporting in your syslog, you can define them also.
- */
-#define SX_REPORT_FIFO
-#define SX_REPORT_OVERRUN
-#endif
-
 /* Function prototypes */
 static void sx_disable_tx_interrupts(void *ptr);
 static void sx_enable_tx_interrupts(void *ptr);
@@ -1011,7 +988,7 @@ #define CFLAG port->gs.tty->termios->c_c
 	}
 	sx_dprintk(SX_DEBUG_TERMIOS, "oflags: %x(%d)\n",
 			port->gs.tty->termios->c_oflag, O_OTHER(port->gs.tty));
-	/* port->c_dcd = sx_get_CD (port); */
+
 	func_exit();
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1173,7 +1150,6 @@ static inline void sx_receive_chars(stru
 		/* Tell the rest of the system the news. Great news. New 
 		   characters! */
 		tty_flip_buffer_push(tty);
-		/*    tty_schedule_flip (tty); */
 	}
 
 	func_exit();
@@ -1254,9 +1230,6 @@ static irqreturn_t sx_interrupt(int irq,
 	/* AAargh! The order in which to do these things is essential and
 	   not trivial. 
 
-	   - Rate limit goes before "recursive". Otherwise a series of
-	   recursive calls will hang the machine in the interrupt routine. 
-
 	   - hardware twiddling goes before "recursive". Otherwise when we
 	   poll the card, and a recursive interrupt happens, we won't
 	   ack the card, so it might keep on interrupting us. (especially
@@ -1271,28 +1244,6 @@ static irqreturn_t sx_interrupt(int irq,
 	   - The initialized test goes before recursive. 
 	 */
 
-#ifdef IRQ_RATE_LIMIT
-	/* Aaargh! I'm ashamed. This costs more lines-of-code than the
-	   actual interrupt routine!. (Well, used to when I wrote that
-	   comment) */
-	{
-		static int lastjif;
-		static int nintr = 0;
-
-		if (lastjif == jiffies) {
-			if (++nintr > IRQ_RATE_LIMIT) {
-				free_irq(board->irq, board);
-				printk(KERN_ERR "sx: Too many interrupts. "
-						"Turning off interrupt %d.\n",
-						board->irq);
-			}
-		} else {
-			lastjif = jiffies;
-			nintr = 0;
-		}
-	}
-#endif
-
 	if (board->irq == irq) {
 		/* Tell the card we've noticed the interrupt. */
 
@@ -1401,7 +1352,6 @@ static void sx_enable_tx_interrupts(void
 
 static void sx_disable_rx_interrupts(void *ptr)
 {
-	/*  struct sx_port *port = ptr; */
 	func_enter();
 
 	func_exit();
@@ -1409,7 +1359,6 @@ static void sx_disable_rx_interrupts(voi
 
 static void sx_enable_rx_interrupts(void *ptr)
 {
-	/*  struct sx_port *port = ptr; */
 	func_enter();
 
 	func_exit();
@@ -1505,13 +1454,8 @@ static int sx_open(struct tty_struct *tt
 	if (port->gs.count <= 1)
 		sx_setsignals(port, 1, 1);
 
-#if 0
-	if (sx_debug & SX_DEBUG_OPEN)
-		my_hd(port, sizeof(*port));
-#else
 	if (sx_debug & SX_DEBUG_OPEN)
 		my_hd_io(port->board->base + port->ch_base, sizeof(*port));
-#endif
 
 	if (port->gs.count <= 1) {
 		if (sx_send_command(port, HS_LOPEN, -1, HS_IDLE_OPEN) != 1) {
@@ -1535,7 +1479,6 @@ #endif
 
 		return retval;
 	}
-	/* tty->low_latency = 1; */
 
 	port->c_dcd = sx_get_CD(port);
 	sx_dprintk(SX_DEBUG_OPEN, "at open: cd=%d\n", port->c_dcd);
@@ -1576,9 +1519,6 @@ static void sx_close(void *ptr)
 	if (port->gs.count) {
 		sx_dprintk(SX_DEBUG_CLOSE, "WARNING port count:%d\n",
 				port->gs.count);
-		/*printk("%s SETTING port count to zero: %p count: %d\n",
-				__FUNCTION__, port, port->gs.count);
-		port->gs.count = 0;*/
 	}
 
 	func_exit();
@@ -1641,52 +1581,6 @@ #undef W1
 #undef R0
 #undef R1
 
-#define MARCHUP		for (i = min; i < max; i += 2)
-#define MARCHDOWN	for (i = max - 1; i >= min; i -= 2)
-#define W0		write_sx_word(board, i, 0x55aa)
-#define W1		write_sx_word(board, i, 0xaa55)
-#define R0		if (read_sx_word(board, i) != 0x55aa) return 1
-#define R1		if (read_sx_word(board, i) != 0xaa55) return 1
-
-#if 0
-/* This memtest takes a human-noticable time. You normally only do it
-   once a boot, so I guess that it is worth it. */
-static int do_memtest_w(struct sx_board *board, int min, int max)
-{
-	int i;
-
-	MARCHUP {
-		W0;
-	}
-	MARCHUP {
-		R0;
-		W1;
-		R1;
-		W0;
-		R0;
-		W1;
-	}
-	MARCHUP {
-		R1;
-		W0;
-		W1;
-	}
-	MARCHDOWN {
-		R1;
-		W0;
-		W1;
-		W0;
-	}
-	MARCHDOWN {
-		R0;
-		W1;
-		W0;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-#endif
-
 static int sx_fw_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
 		unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 {
@@ -1700,13 +1594,8 @@ static int sx_fw_ioctl(struct inode *ino
 
 	func_enter();
 
-#if 0
 	/* Removed superuser check: Sysops can use the permissions on the device
 	   file to restrict access. Recommendation: Root only. (root.root 600) */
-	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
-		return -EPERM;
-	}
-#endif
 
 	sx_dprintk(SX_DEBUG_FIRMWARE, "IOCTL %x: %lx\n", cmd, arg);
 
@@ -1756,10 +1645,8 @@ #endif
 			rc = do_memtest(board, 0, 0x7000);
 			if (!rc)
 				rc = do_memtest(board, 0, 0x7000);
-			/*if (!rc) rc = do_memtest_w (board, 0, 0x7000); */
 		} else {
 			rc = do_memtest(board, 0, 0x7ff8);
-			/* if (!rc) rc = do_memtest_w (board, 0, 0x7ff8); */
 		}
 		sx_dprintk(SX_DEBUG_FIRMWARE, "returning memtest result= %d\n",
 			   rc);
@@ -1893,8 +1780,6 @@ static int sx_ioctl(struct tty_struct *t
 	void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
 	int ival;
 
-	/* func_enter2(); */
-
 	rc = 0;
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case TIOCGSOFTCAR:
@@ -1919,7 +1804,6 @@ static int sx_ioctl(struct tty_struct *t
 		break;
 	}
 
-	/* func_exit(); */
 	return rc;
 }
 
@@ -2030,7 +1914,6 @@ static int sx_init_board(struct sx_board
 	}
 
 	/* grab the first module type... */
-	/* board->ta_type = mod_compat_type (read_sx_byte (board, 0x80 + 0x08)); */
 	board->ta_type = mod_compat_type(sx_read_module_byte(board, 0x80,
 				mc_chip));
 
@@ -2075,17 +1958,6 @@ static int sx_init_board(struct sx_board
 			chans = 0;
 			break;
 		}
-#if 0				/* Problem fixed: firmware 3.05 */
-		if (IS_SX_BOARD(board) && (type == TA8)) {
-			/* There are some issues with the firmware and the DCD/RTS
-			   lines. It might work if you tie them together or something.
-			   It might also work if you get a newer sx_firmware.   Therefore
-			   this is just a warning. */
-			printk(KERN_WARNING
-			       "sx: The SX host doesn't work too well "
-			       "with the TA8 adapters.\nSpecialix is working on it.\n");
-		}
-#endif
 	}
 
 	if (chans) {
@@ -2465,8 +2337,6 @@ #endif
 			}
 			sx_dprintk(SX_DEBUG_PROBE, "\n");
 		}
-		/* This has to be done earlier. */
-		/* board->flags |= SX_BOARD_INITIALIZED; */
 	}
 
 	func_exit();
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ