[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <17859287641876623669@karneval.cz>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:42:06 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: <support@...cialix.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] Char: sx, remove unneeded stuff
sx, remove unneeded stuff
remove #if 0's and commented code. We have version control for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
---
commit 10fd13e67b848584d1553b524d2e925ad60a1b4f
tree 6a6750db2865877d6c7c31a5f8406e53e79af787
parent b7dbf65a81c1707405982cb66aa5df5a9ada464e
author Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com> Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:43:11 +0100
committer Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com> Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:43:11 +0100
drivers/char/sx.c | 132 -----------------------------------------------------
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/sx.c b/drivers/char/sx.c
index 7395c13..fe5fabb 100644
--- a/drivers/char/sx.c
+++ b/drivers/char/sx.c
@@ -252,29 +252,6 @@ #endif
/* Am I paranoid or not ? ;-) */
#undef SX_PARANOIA_CHECK
-/* 20 -> 2000 per second. The card should rate-limit interrupts at 100
- Hz, but it is user configurable. I don't recommend going above 1000
- Hz. The interrupt ratelimit might trigger if the interrupt is
- shared with a very active other device. */
-#define IRQ_RATE_LIMIT 20
-
-/* Sharing interrupts is possible now. If the other device wants more
- than 2000 interrupts per second, we'd gracefully decline further
- interrupts. That's not what we want. On the other hand, if the
- other device interrupts 2000 times a second, don't use the SX
- interrupt. Use polling. */
-#undef IRQ_RATE_LIMIT
-
-#if 0
-/* Not implemented */
-/*
- * The following defines are mostly for testing purposes. But if you need
- * some nice reporting in your syslog, you can define them also.
- */
-#define SX_REPORT_FIFO
-#define SX_REPORT_OVERRUN
-#endif
-
/* Function prototypes */
static void sx_disable_tx_interrupts(void *ptr);
static void sx_enable_tx_interrupts(void *ptr);
@@ -1011,7 +988,7 @@ #define CFLAG port->gs.tty->termios->c_c
}
sx_dprintk(SX_DEBUG_TERMIOS, "oflags: %x(%d)\n",
port->gs.tty->termios->c_oflag, O_OTHER(port->gs.tty));
- /* port->c_dcd = sx_get_CD (port); */
+
func_exit();
return 0;
}
@@ -1173,7 +1150,6 @@ static inline void sx_receive_chars(stru
/* Tell the rest of the system the news. Great news. New
characters! */
tty_flip_buffer_push(tty);
- /* tty_schedule_flip (tty); */
}
func_exit();
@@ -1254,9 +1230,6 @@ static irqreturn_t sx_interrupt(int irq,
/* AAargh! The order in which to do these things is essential and
not trivial.
- - Rate limit goes before "recursive". Otherwise a series of
- recursive calls will hang the machine in the interrupt routine.
-
- hardware twiddling goes before "recursive". Otherwise when we
poll the card, and a recursive interrupt happens, we won't
ack the card, so it might keep on interrupting us. (especially
@@ -1271,28 +1244,6 @@ static irqreturn_t sx_interrupt(int irq,
- The initialized test goes before recursive.
*/
-#ifdef IRQ_RATE_LIMIT
- /* Aaargh! I'm ashamed. This costs more lines-of-code than the
- actual interrupt routine!. (Well, used to when I wrote that
- comment) */
- {
- static int lastjif;
- static int nintr = 0;
-
- if (lastjif == jiffies) {
- if (++nintr > IRQ_RATE_LIMIT) {
- free_irq(board->irq, board);
- printk(KERN_ERR "sx: Too many interrupts. "
- "Turning off interrupt %d.\n",
- board->irq);
- }
- } else {
- lastjif = jiffies;
- nintr = 0;
- }
- }
-#endif
-
if (board->irq == irq) {
/* Tell the card we've noticed the interrupt. */
@@ -1401,7 +1352,6 @@ static void sx_enable_tx_interrupts(void
static void sx_disable_rx_interrupts(void *ptr)
{
- /* struct sx_port *port = ptr; */
func_enter();
func_exit();
@@ -1409,7 +1359,6 @@ static void sx_disable_rx_interrupts(voi
static void sx_enable_rx_interrupts(void *ptr)
{
- /* struct sx_port *port = ptr; */
func_enter();
func_exit();
@@ -1505,13 +1454,8 @@ static int sx_open(struct tty_struct *tt
if (port->gs.count <= 1)
sx_setsignals(port, 1, 1);
-#if 0
- if (sx_debug & SX_DEBUG_OPEN)
- my_hd(port, sizeof(*port));
-#else
if (sx_debug & SX_DEBUG_OPEN)
my_hd_io(port->board->base + port->ch_base, sizeof(*port));
-#endif
if (port->gs.count <= 1) {
if (sx_send_command(port, HS_LOPEN, -1, HS_IDLE_OPEN) != 1) {
@@ -1535,7 +1479,6 @@ #endif
return retval;
}
- /* tty->low_latency = 1; */
port->c_dcd = sx_get_CD(port);
sx_dprintk(SX_DEBUG_OPEN, "at open: cd=%d\n", port->c_dcd);
@@ -1576,9 +1519,6 @@ static void sx_close(void *ptr)
if (port->gs.count) {
sx_dprintk(SX_DEBUG_CLOSE, "WARNING port count:%d\n",
port->gs.count);
- /*printk("%s SETTING port count to zero: %p count: %d\n",
- __FUNCTION__, port, port->gs.count);
- port->gs.count = 0;*/
}
func_exit();
@@ -1641,52 +1581,6 @@ #undef W1
#undef R0
#undef R1
-#define MARCHUP for (i = min; i < max; i += 2)
-#define MARCHDOWN for (i = max - 1; i >= min; i -= 2)
-#define W0 write_sx_word(board, i, 0x55aa)
-#define W1 write_sx_word(board, i, 0xaa55)
-#define R0 if (read_sx_word(board, i) != 0x55aa) return 1
-#define R1 if (read_sx_word(board, i) != 0xaa55) return 1
-
-#if 0
-/* This memtest takes a human-noticable time. You normally only do it
- once a boot, so I guess that it is worth it. */
-static int do_memtest_w(struct sx_board *board, int min, int max)
-{
- int i;
-
- MARCHUP {
- W0;
- }
- MARCHUP {
- R0;
- W1;
- R1;
- W0;
- R0;
- W1;
- }
- MARCHUP {
- R1;
- W0;
- W1;
- }
- MARCHDOWN {
- R1;
- W0;
- W1;
- W0;
- }
- MARCHDOWN {
- R0;
- W1;
- W0;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-#endif
-
static int sx_fw_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
{
@@ -1700,13 +1594,8 @@ static int sx_fw_ioctl(struct inode *ino
func_enter();
-#if 0
/* Removed superuser check: Sysops can use the permissions on the device
file to restrict access. Recommendation: Root only. (root.root 600) */
- if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
- return -EPERM;
- }
-#endif
sx_dprintk(SX_DEBUG_FIRMWARE, "IOCTL %x: %lx\n", cmd, arg);
@@ -1756,10 +1645,8 @@ #endif
rc = do_memtest(board, 0, 0x7000);
if (!rc)
rc = do_memtest(board, 0, 0x7000);
- /*if (!rc) rc = do_memtest_w (board, 0, 0x7000); */
} else {
rc = do_memtest(board, 0, 0x7ff8);
- /* if (!rc) rc = do_memtest_w (board, 0, 0x7ff8); */
}
sx_dprintk(SX_DEBUG_FIRMWARE, "returning memtest result= %d\n",
rc);
@@ -1893,8 +1780,6 @@ static int sx_ioctl(struct tty_struct *t
void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
int ival;
- /* func_enter2(); */
-
rc = 0;
switch (cmd) {
case TIOCGSOFTCAR:
@@ -1919,7 +1804,6 @@ static int sx_ioctl(struct tty_struct *t
break;
}
- /* func_exit(); */
return rc;
}
@@ -2030,7 +1914,6 @@ static int sx_init_board(struct sx_board
}
/* grab the first module type... */
- /* board->ta_type = mod_compat_type (read_sx_byte (board, 0x80 + 0x08)); */
board->ta_type = mod_compat_type(sx_read_module_byte(board, 0x80,
mc_chip));
@@ -2075,17 +1958,6 @@ static int sx_init_board(struct sx_board
chans = 0;
break;
}
-#if 0 /* Problem fixed: firmware 3.05 */
- if (IS_SX_BOARD(board) && (type == TA8)) {
- /* There are some issues with the firmware and the DCD/RTS
- lines. It might work if you tie them together or something.
- It might also work if you get a newer sx_firmware. Therefore
- this is just a warning. */
- printk(KERN_WARNING
- "sx: The SX host doesn't work too well "
- "with the TA8 adapters.\nSpecialix is working on it.\n");
- }
-#endif
}
if (chans) {
@@ -2465,8 +2337,6 @@ #endif
}
sx_dprintk(SX_DEBUG_PROBE, "\n");
}
- /* This has to be done earlier. */
- /* board->flags |= SX_BOARD_INITIALIZED; */
}
func_exit();
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists