[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061031014914.9af0dde9.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:49:14 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc3] i386/io_apic: fix compiler warning in
create_irq
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:37:37 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 17:04 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > irq = -ENOSPC;
> > > > + vector = 0;
> > >
> > > NAK - the code is fine, and this is fixed in Jeff's gcc-warnings
> > tree
> > > via annotation.
> >
> > err, what gcc-warnings tree?
> >
> > git
> > +ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/misc-2.6.git#gccbug
> > just does lots of initialise-to-zero thingies, doesn't have any
> > special
> > annotation and doesn't fix io_apic.c.
>
> this is an initialize-to-zero annotation for a false-positive gcc
> warning. If it's not in Jeff tree yet then it should be there ...
>
hm, I wouldn't call that "annotation".
Now, the
#define SHUT_GCC_UP(x) = x
...
int foo SHUT_GCC_UP(foo);
...
(or whatever it was) trick was "annotation". A good way of doing it too, IMO.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists