lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:51:45 +1100
From:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Check bio address after mapping through partitions.

This would be good for 2.6.19 and even 18.2, if it is seens acceptable.
raid0 at least (possibly other) can be made to Oops with a bad partition 
table and best fix seem to be to not let out-of-range request get down
to the device.

### Comments for Changeset

Partitions are not limited to live within a device.  So
we should range check after partition mapping.

Note that 'maxsector' was being used for two different things.  I have
split off the second usage into 'old_sector' so that maxsector can be
still be used for it's primary usage later in the function.

Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>

### Diffstat output
 ./block/ll_rw_blk.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff .prev/block/ll_rw_blk.c ./block/ll_rw_blk.c
--- .prev/block/ll_rw_blk.c	2006-10-31 11:43:33.000000000 +1100
+++ ./block/ll_rw_blk.c	2006-10-31 12:47:07.000000000 +1100
@@ -3007,6 +3007,7 @@ static inline void __generic_make_reques
 {
 	request_queue_t *q;
 	sector_t maxsector;
+	sector_t old_sector;
 	int ret, nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio);
 	dev_t old_dev;
 
@@ -3035,7 +3036,7 @@ static inline void __generic_make_reques
 	 * NOTE: we don't repeat the blk_size check for each new device.
 	 * Stacking drivers are expected to know what they are doing.
 	 */
-	maxsector = -1;
+	old_sector = -1;
 	old_dev = 0;
 	do {
 		char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
@@ -3069,15 +3070,30 @@ end_io:
 		 */
 		blk_partition_remap(bio);
 
-		if (maxsector != -1)
+		if (old_sector != -1)
 			blk_add_trace_remap(q, bio, old_dev, bio->bi_sector, 
-					    maxsector);
+					    old_sector);
 
 		blk_add_trace_bio(q, bio, BLK_TA_QUEUE);
 
-		maxsector = bio->bi_sector;
+		old_sector = bio->bi_sector;
 		old_dev = bio->bi_bdev->bd_dev;
 
+		maxsector = bio->bi_bdev->bd_inode->i_size >> 9;
+		if (maxsector) {
+			sector_t sector = bio->bi_sector;
+
+			if (maxsector < nr_sectors || maxsector - nr_sectors < sector) {
+				/*
+				 * This may well happen - partitions are not checked
+				 * to make sure they are within the size of the
+				 * whole device.
+				 */
+				handle_bad_sector(bio);
+				goto end_io;
+			}
+		}
+
 		ret = q->make_request_fn(q, bio);
 	} while (ret);
 }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ