linux-kernel - RE: AHCI should try to claim all AHCI controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <FFECF24D2A7F6D418B9511AF6F358602F2D2C0@shacnexch2.atitech.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Nov 2006 21:39:23 +0800
From:	"Conke Hu" <conke.hu@....com>
To:	"Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Cc:	<torvalds@...l.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: AHCI should try to claim all AHCI controllers

Thank you, Jeff.
But who should be the "Signed-off-by" man when I create a patch and ready for sending it to kernel org?

Best regards,
Conke @ AMD, Inc.



-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@...ox.com] 
Sent: 2006年11月1日 13:11
To: Conke Hu
Cc: torvalds@...l.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AHCI should try to claim all AHCI controllers

Conke Hu wrote:
> Hi all,
> 	According to PCI 3.0 spec, ACHI's PCI class code is 0x010601,
> and I suggest the ahci driver had better try to claim all ahci
> controllers, pls see the following patch:

BTW, make sure to always include a Signed-off-by: line in every patch.

See http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html and 
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt and 
Documentation/SubmittingPatches (in the kernel source tree).

	Jeff





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/