linux-kernel - Re: AHCI should try to claim all AHCI controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:15:23 +0100
From:	Martin Waitz <tali@...ingilde.org>
To:	Conke Hu <conke.hu@....com>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, torvalds@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AHCI should try to claim all AHCI controllers

hoi :)

On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:39:23PM +0800, Conke Hu wrote:
> But who should be the "Signed-off-by" man when I create a patch and ready for sending it to kernel org?

yourself.

Please look into Documentation/SubmittingPatches paragraph 11.

-- 
Martin Waitz

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)