| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0611012123350.3736@poirot.grange> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 21:26:13 +0100 (CET) From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de> To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, ray-gmail@...rabbit.org, "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...gle.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com> Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4 > > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:34:23 PST, Ray Lee said: > > > On 10/31/06, Martin J. Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com> wrote: > > > > > At some point we should get rid of all the "politeness" warnings, just > > > > > because they can end up hiding the _real_ ones. > > > > > > > > Yay! Couldn't agree more. Does this mean you'll take patches for all the > > > > uninitialized variable crap from gcc 4.x ? > > > > > > What would be useful in the short term is a tool that shows only the > > > new warnings that didn't exist in the last point release. Would it be possible to create a new verbosity level like V=2 to hide those "politeness" warnings so that by default everybody still would see all of them, but those needing to track regressions could use it and only see severe ones? Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists