[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <454902CC.4040700@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:25:48 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Derek Fults <dfults@....com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updated, add get_range, allows a hyhpenated range to
get_options
Derek Fults wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:52 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Derek Fults wrote:
>>> This allows a hyphenated range of positive numbers M-N, in the string
>>> passed to command line helper function, get_options. This will expand
>>> the range and insert the values[M, M+1, ..., N] into the ints array in
>>> get_options.
>>>
>>> Currently the command line option "isolcpus=" takes as its argument a
>>> list of cpus.
>>> Format: <cpu number>,...,<cpu number>
>>> This can get extremely long when isolating the majority of cpus on a
>>> large system. Valid values of <cpu_number> include all cpus, 0 to
>>> "number of CPUs in system - 1".
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Derek Fults <dfults@....com>
>>>
>>> Index: linux/lib/cmdline.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux.orig/lib/cmdline.c 2006-09-19 22:42:06.000000000 -0500
>>> +++ linux/lib/cmdline.c 2006-11-01 12:36:20.059166727 -0600
>>> @@ -16,6 +16,23 @@
>>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>> #include <linux/string.h>
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * If a hyphen was found in get_option, this will handle the
>>> + * range of numbers, M-N. This will expand the range and insert
>>> + * the values[M, M+1, ..., N] into the ints array in get_options.
>>> + */
>> Derek,
>> Thanks for persisting thru this. It's all fine for me except the
>> comment block above. If a comment block begins with "/**", then
>> it's supposed to be in kernel-doc format (see
>> Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt), with function name &
>> parameters (if applicable). However, that mostly needs to be done
>> for non-static functions, so probably just change /** to /*
>> and leave the rest of the comment block as is.
>> My other comment-block comment was also about kernel long-comment
>> style, which is
>> /*
>> * begin
>> * more
>> * end
>> */
>> so now you have achieved that also, so thanks again.
>
> I fixed both comments to match that format. Thanks for all the help and
> your patience.
> I'm posting the new patch in this replay. Is that an acceptable
> practice, or does one normally post all fixes to a patch in a new
> message?
It happens both ways, but since this is mostly new code/feature,
I suggest that you repost it and also cc: akpm@...l.org on it.
And it still needs a user. Will you be converting isolcpus=
to use this functionality?
It likely won't be merged until it has a user.
--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists