[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061101162727.72f1183b.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:27:27 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
"Neil Horman" <nhorman@...driver.com>,
"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org, kjhall@...ibm.com,
maxk@...lcomm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KJ][PATCH] Correct misc_register return code handling in
several drivers
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:11:55 -0800
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> > Hmm, I guess that should be defined once and for all in
> > Documentation/CodingStyle
>
> I have some other CodingStyle changes to submit, but feel free
> to write this one up.
Starting labels in column 2 gives me the creeps, personally. But there's a
decent justification for it.
> However, I didn't know that we had a known style for this, other
> than "not indented so far that it's hidden".
>
> If a label in column 0 [0-based :] confuses patch, then that's
> a reason, I suppose. I wasn't aware of that one...
> In a case like that, we usually say "fix the tool then."
The problem is that `diff -p' screws up and displays the label: in the
place where it should be displaying the function name.
Of course, lots of people forget the -p anyway... Maybe we can fix those
tools ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists