[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a8748490611011630t43bebed8i808cba2f4c08f026@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:30:22 +0100
From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jschlst@...ba.org,
acme@...ectiva.com.br
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LLC: Avoid potential NULL dereference in net/llc/af_llc.c::llc_ui_accept() .
On 02/11/06, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:21:53 +0100
>
> > Since skb_dequeue() may return NULL we risk dereferencing a NULL pointer at
> > if (!skb->sk)
> > This patch avoids that by also testing for a NULL skb.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
>
> It can't return NULL in this context because we just checked
> skb_queue_empty() with the socket lock held and llc_wait_data()
> will return zero only if skb_queue_empty() is false.
>
> I know it's hard for automated tools to see this, but it's not
> reasonable to put this extra check in there since it is
> superfluous due to the above mentioned invariants.
>
Fair enough. Ignore the patch.
Thank you for the explanation.
--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists