[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1162425710.6848.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:01:50 +1100
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] paravirtualization: Allow selected bug checks to
be skipped by paravirt kernels
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 15:29 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:30:43 +1100
> Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> > --- a/include/asm-i386/bugs.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-i386/bugs.h
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> > #include <asm/processor.h>
> > #include <asm/i387.h>
> > #include <asm/msr.h>
> > +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
>
> In many other places you have
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> #include <asm/paravirt.h>
> ...
>
> But not here.
>
> Making <asm/paravirt.h> invulnerable would be the more typical approach.
It *is* actually safe. The "#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT / #include
<asm/paravirt.h> / #else / <... native versions...>" is to give a big
hint to the reader to look in paravirt.h for the real definitions.
Originally I had a noparavirt.h where all these lived, and people hated
it. So we did it this way, which minimizes churn.
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists