[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061103060427.GA12399@in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:34:27 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To: torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...l.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, martin@...enz.eu.org,
srinivasa@...ibm.com, vatsa@...ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] Fix the spurious unlock_cpu_hotplug false warnings.
Cpu-hotplug locking has a minor race case caused because of setting the
variable "recursive" to NULL *after* releasing the cpu_bitmask_lock in the
function unlock_cpu_hotplug,instead of doing so before releasing the
cpu_bitmask_lock.
This was the cause of most of the recent false spurious lock_cpu_unlock
warnings.
This should fix the problem reported by Martin Lorenz reported in
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/29/127.
Thanks to Srinivasa DS for pointing it out.
Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
--
kernel/cpu.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: hotplug/kernel/cpu.c
===================================================================
--- hotplug.orig/kernel/cpu.c
+++ hotplug/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ void unlock_cpu_hotplug(void)
recursive_depth--;
return;
}
- mutex_unlock(&cpu_bitmask_lock);
recursive = NULL;
+ mutex_unlock(&cpu_bitmask_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unlock_cpu_hotplug);
--
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists