lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 5 Nov 2006 11:37:12 -0500
From:	"Albert Cahalan" <>
To:	"Albert Cahalan" <>,,,
Subject: Re: New filesystem for Linux

On 11/4/06, Jan-Benedict Glaw <> wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-11-04 14:59:53 -0500, Albert Cahalan <> wrote:

> > BTW, a person with disk recovery experience told me that drives
> > will sometimes reorder the sectors. Sector 42 becomes sector 7732,
> > sector 880880 becomes sector 12345, etc. The very best filesystems
> > can handle with without data loss. (for example, ZFS) Merely great
> > filesystems will at least recognize that the data has been trashed.
> Uh? This should be transparent to the host computer, so logical sector
> numbers won't change.

"should be" does not imply "won't"   :-)

On a drive which is capable of remapping sectors, imagine what
happens if the remapping data itself is corrupted. (the user data
is perfectly fine and is not being relocated)

What I mean is that the logical sector numbers not only change,
but they are the only thing changing. The user data never moves
to a different physical location, and is never intended to move.
The user data is perfectly readable. It just appears in the wrong
place as viewed by the OS.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists