[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <787b0d920611050837i4b488167pcadfb9d70e96a372@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 11:37:12 -0500
From: "Albert Cahalan" <acahalan@...il.com>
To: "Albert Cahalan" <acahalan@...il.com>, kangur@...com.net,
mikulas@...ax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New filesystem for Linux
On 11/4/06, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de> wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-11-04 14:59:53 -0500, Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com> wrote:
> > BTW, a person with disk recovery experience told me that drives
> > will sometimes reorder the sectors. Sector 42 becomes sector 7732,
> > sector 880880 becomes sector 12345, etc. The very best filesystems
> > can handle with without data loss. (for example, ZFS) Merely great
> > filesystems will at least recognize that the data has been trashed.
>
> Uh? This should be transparent to the host computer, so logical sector
> numbers won't change.
"should be" does not imply "won't" :-)
On a drive which is capable of remapping sectors, imagine what
happens if the remapping data itself is corrupted. (the user data
is perfectly fine and is not being relocated)
What I mean is that the logical sector numbers not only change,
but they are the only thing changing. The user data never moves
to a different physical location, and is never intended to move.
The user data is perfectly readable. It just appears in the wrong
place as viewed by the OS.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists