linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <454D6FC7.3040308@vmware.com>
Date:	Sat, 04 Nov 2006 20:59:51 -0800
From:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs	for	paravirtualizing
 critical operations

Rusty Russell wrote:
> Andi, the patches work against Andrew's tree, and he's merged them in
> rc4-mm2.  There are a few warnings to clean up, but it seems basically
> sound.
>
> At this point I our think time is better spent on beating those patches
> up, rather than going back and figuring out why they don't work in your
> tree.
>   

This begs the question - should we rebase the paravirt-ops patchset 
against -rc4-mm2?  I almost did it today, but didn't want to stomp on 
anybody else's toes.

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/