linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 05 Nov 2006 16:08:37 +1100
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and
	stubs	for	paravirtualizing critical operations

On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 20:59 -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Andi, the patches work against Andrew's tree, and he's merged them in
> > rc4-mm2.  There are a few warnings to clean up, but it seems basically
> > sound.
> >
> > At this point I our think time is better spent on beating those patches
> > up, rather than going back and figuring out why they don't work in your
> > tree.
> >   
> 
> This begs the question - should we rebase the paravirt-ops patchset 
> against -rc4-mm2?  I almost did it today, but didn't want to stomp on 
> anybody else's toes.

Yes.  Andrew has shot me a couple of warnings which people have found,
and I'm preparing patches for them.  Rebasing will make it easier.

If you're not awake now, I'll do it.  If you are, see me on IRC.

Rusty.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/