[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061106202313.GA691@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:23:13 +0100
From: Jörn Engel <joern@...nheim.fh-wedel.de>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make last_inode counter in new_inode 32-bit on kernels that offer x86 compatability
On Mon, 6 November 2006 13:47:23 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 11:22 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:12:05PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > The attached patch remedies this by making the last_inode counter be an
> > > unsigned int on kernels that have ia32 compatability mode enabled.
> >
> > ... and this only happens on ia64/x86_64 kernels, not sparc64, ppc64,
> > s390x, parisc64 or mips64?
>
> Here's a new (untested) patch that replaces the ia32 specific
> compatability mode defines with CONFIG_COMPAT, as suggested by Matthew.
While you're at it, how about making last_ino per-sb instead of
system-wide? ino collisions after a wrap are just as bad as inos
beyond 32bit. And this should be a fairly simple method to reduce the
risk.
Also, do you have a testcase that can actually force the wrap?
Jörn
--
Don't patch bad code, rewrite it.
-- Kernigham and Pike, according to Rusty
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists