[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <454F9BB3.6020004@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:31:47 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...nheim.fh-wedel.de>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make last_inode counter in new_inode 32-bit on kernels
that offer x86 compatability
Jörn Engel a écrit :
> On Mon, 6 November 2006 13:47:23 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 11:22 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:12:05PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
>>>> The attached patch remedies this by making the last_inode counter be an
>>>> unsigned int on kernels that have ia32 compatability mode enabled.
>>> ... and this only happens on ia64/x86_64 kernels, not sparc64, ppc64,
>>> s390x, parisc64 or mips64?
>> Here's a new (untested) patch that replaces the ia32 specific
>> compatability mode defines with CONFIG_COMPAT, as suggested by Matthew.
>
> While you're at it, how about making last_ino per-sb instead of
> system-wide? ino collisions after a wrap are just as bad as inos
> beyond 32bit. And this should be a fairly simple method to reduce the
> risk.
>
> Also, do you have a testcase that can actually force the wrap?
while (1) {
int fd[2];
pipe(fd);
close(fd[0]);
close(fd[1]);
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists