[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061106.143831.88477819.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:38:31 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org
Cc: acme@...driva.com
Subject: Re: + net-uninline-xfrm_selector_match.patch added to -mm tree
From: akpm@...l.org
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 11:34:12 -0800
> Subject: net: uninline xfrm_selector_match()
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
>
> Six callsites, huge.
>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...driva.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
You can't implement it like this :-)
xfrm_user.c is a bad place to put the uninlined version because
this can be built modular, whereas the callsites in places such
as xfrm_policy.c will be built statically into the kernel.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists