| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:13:29 +0300 From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> Cc: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@...gsvamp.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [take22 0/4] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism. On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:47:41PM +0100, Pavel Machek (pavel@....cz) wrote: > It has been show in this thread that kevent is too different to kqueue > as is... but what are the advantages of kevent? Perhaps we should use > kqueue on Linux, too (even if it means one more rewrite for you...?) Should we use *BSD VMM system when we have superiour Linux one? P.S. Do not drop Cc: list. -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists