linux-kernel - Re: [take22 0/4] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061106101633.GE2978@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:16:33 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc:	Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@...gsvamp.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [take22 0/4] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.

On Mon 2006-11-06 13:13:29, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:47:41PM +0100, Pavel Machek (pavel@....cz) wrote:
> > It has been show in this thread that kevent is too different to kqueue
> > as is... but what are the advantages of kevent? Perhaps we should use
> > kqueue on Linux, too (even if it means one more rewrite for you...?)
> 
> Should we use *BSD VMM system when we have superiour Linux one?

Very different question; VMM system is not something that has userland
API.

Can you explain why kevent is better than kqueue?

> P.S. Do not drop Cc: list.

It was not me who dropped cc list.

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/