linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] add dev_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061107062536.GA3729@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 6 Nov 2006 22:25:36 -0800
From:	Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	"Benzi Galili (Benzi@...leMP.com)" <benzi@...lemp.com>,
	"Shai Fultheim (Shai@...lex86.org)" <shai@...lex86.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] add dev_to_node()

On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:53:23AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 06:06:48PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:56:29PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > 
> > This will break the compile for !NUMA if someone ends up doing a bisect
> > and lands here as a bisect point.
> > 
> > You introduce this nice wrapper..
> 
> The dev_to_node wrapper is not enough as we can't assign to (-1) for
> the non-NUMA case.  So I added a second macro, set_dev_node for that.
> 
> The patch below compiles and works on numa and non-NUMA platforms.
> 
> 

Hi Christoph,
dev_to_node does not work as expected on x86_64 (and i386).  This is because
node value returned by pcibus_to_node is initialized after a struct device
is created with current x86_64 code.

We need the node value initialized before the call to pci_scan_bus_parented,
as the generic devices are allocated and initialized
off pci_scan_child_bus, which gets called from pci_scan_bus_parented
The following patch does that using "pci_sysdata" introduced by the PCI
domain patches in -mm.

Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <alok.kataria@...softinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
Signed-off-by: Shai Fultheim <shai@...lex86.org>

Index: linux-2.6.19-rc4mm2/arch/i386/pci/acpi.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc4mm2.orig/arch/i386/pci/acpi.c	2006-11-06 11:03:50.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc4mm2/arch/i386/pci/acpi.c	2006-11-06 22:04:14.000000000 -0800
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_acpi_scan
 {
 	struct pci_bus *bus;
 	struct pci_sysdata *sd;
+	int pxm;
 
 	/* Allocate per-root-bus (not per bus) arch-specific data.
 	 * TODO: leak; this memory is never freed.
@@ -30,15 +31,21 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_acpi_scan
 	}
 #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */
 
+	sd->node = -1;
+
+	pxm = acpi_get_pxm(device->handle);
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
+	if (pxm >= 0)
+		sd->node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
+#endif
+
 	bus = pci_scan_bus_parented(NULL, busnum, &pci_root_ops, sd);
 	if (!bus)
 		kfree(sd);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
 	if (bus != NULL) {
-		int pxm = acpi_get_pxm(device->handle);
 		if (pxm >= 0) {
-			sd->node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
 			printk("bus %d -> pxm %d -> node %d\n",
 				busnum, pxm, sd->node);
 		}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/