linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.19-rc1: Volanomark slowdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1163025128.10806.217.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:32:08 -0800
From:	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
Cc:	Olaf Kirch <okir@...e.de>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...set.davemloft.net,
	kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc1: Volanomark slowdown

On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 15:00 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> 
> Optimizing for loopback is perversion; perversion can be fun but it gets
> to be a obsession then it's sick.
> 

It is not my intention to optimize for this case, but rather to
detect change in kernel behavior.

That's why in my original mail I ask if increase in ACKs could
cause problem for any real application.  

Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/