[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061108151821.5a55fecd.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:18:21 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@...hscale.com>
Cc: rdreier@...co.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, openib-general@...nib.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/ipath - program intconfig register using new HT irq
hook
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:08:30 -0800
"Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@...hscale.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > so... Is this:
> >
> > htirq-refactor-so-we-only-have-one-function-that-writes-to-the-chip.patch
> > htirq-allow-buggy-drivers-of-buggy-hardware-to-write-the-registers.patch
>
> You should drop the above patch from Eric...
>
> > htirq-allow-buggy-drivers-of-buggy-hardware-to-write-the-registers-update.patch
>
> ...in favour of this one, which is my rework of Eric's patch.
>
> > ib-ipath-program-intconfig-register-using-new-ht-irq-hook.patch
If you look, you'll see that the
htirq-allow-buggy-drivers-of-buggy-hardware-to-write-the-registers-update.patch
which I merged is the diff between Eric's patch and yours (ie: the diff
which you should have sent ;))
> > considered 2.6.19 material?
>
> Yes, please. I might be able to simplify the ib-ipath patch (by a
> matter of a few lines), but it works fine as it stands.
>
ho hum, OK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists