[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1psbwzpmx.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 07:00:22 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Magnus Damm <magnus@...inux.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, magnus.damm@...il.com,
fastboot@...ts.osdl.org, Horms <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Dave Anderson <anderson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/02] Elf: Align elf notes properly
Magnus Damm <magnus@...inux.co.jp> writes:
> elf: Align elf notes properly
>
> The kernel currently contains several elf note aligment implementations. Most
> implementations follow the spec on 32-bit platforms, but none current aligns
> the notes correctly on 64-bit platforms. This patch tries to fix this by
> interpreting the 64-bit and 32-bit elf specs as the following:
>
> offset bytes name
> 0 4 n_namesz -+ -+
> 4 4 n_descsz | elf note header |
> 8 4 n_type -+ | elf note entry size - N4
> 12 N1 name |
> N2 N3 desc -+
>
> WS = word size in bytes (4 for 32 bit, 8 for 64 bit)
> N1 = roundup(n_namesz + sizeof(elf note header), WS) - sizeof(elf note header)
> N2 = sizeof(elf note header) + N1
> N3 = roundup(n_descsz, WS)
> N4 = sizeof(elf note header) + N1 + N2
>
> The elf note header contains three 32-bit values on 32-bit and 64-bit systems.
> The header is followed by name and desc data together with padding. The
> alignment and padding varies depending on the word size.
I see your point and I disagree. The notes in a kernel generated
core dump do not vary in size. Find me some implementation evidence that
anyone ever added the extra 4 bytes of alignment to the description and the
padding fields and I will be ready to consider this. Currently this
just appears to be reading a draft spec that doesn't match reality.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists