linux-kernel - Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1163100115.3138.524.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Thu, 09 Nov 2006 20:21:55 +0100
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.

On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 11:12 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:52:00 +0100
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> > Do you have the
> > impression that high quality bug reports on lkml (with this I mean ones
> > where there is sufficient information, which are not a request for
> > support and where the reporter actually answers questions that are asked
> > him) are not getting reasonable attention? 
> 
> Yes.
> 
> And why does the report quality matter?  

because it matters where people spend their time. And if you count
bugreports that are actually distro support questions and then say "but
these aren't looked at" it's not fair either.

> If there's insufficient info you
> just ask for more.

and that does happen. And half the time people just remain silent :(
I know I look at a whole bunch of bugreports in areas that I work on. I
see a lot of other people doing something similar. That doesn't mean
nothing slips through. I'm sure stuff does slip through. I would HOPE
it's really obscure things only; but I fear it's also cases where the
reporter didn't put the right people on the CC as well ;(


> But we all know that and nothing's going to happen so there's really not
> much point in discussing it.  I have 270 saved-up-lkml-bug-reports to
> process.

-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/