[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45548D3E.2010405@openvz.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:31:26 +0300
From: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
mingo@...e.hu, Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Fix misrouted interrupts deadlocks
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 16:55 +0300, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
>> - int ok = misrouted_irq(irq);
>> + int ok;
>> +
>> + spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
>> + ok = misrouted_irq(irq);
>> + spin_lock(&desc->lock);
>
> your fix looks reasonable to me - it's a thinko to call misrouted_irq()
> with the descriptor lock still held. (btw., how did you find it -
> lockdep spinlock debugging or NMI watchdog?)
It was NMI watchdog who reported the deadlock. With lockdep
turned on it wouldn't be caught - local_irq_enable_in_hardirq()
is nothing but a "do { } while (0)" if CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y :)
The second issue (with 2 cpus involved) was discovered
by code examining.
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>
> Ingo
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists