linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: fix more issues with 32-bit cycles_t in latency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200611132006.07086.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:06:06 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To:	mingo@...e.hu
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ux-mips.org,
	dwalker@...sta.com, khilman@...sta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: fix more issues with 32-bit cycles_t in latency_trace.c

Hello.

On Monday 13 November 2006 00:23, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> In addition to clock wrap check being falsely triggered with 32-bit
> cycles_t, as noticed to Kevin Hilman, there's another issue: using %Lx
> format to print 32-bit values warrants erroneous values on 32-bit machines
> like ARM and PPC32.

   There's many more warnings with other options turned on, so I'll post an updated patch soon...

WBR, Sergei

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/