[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061113103051.D17720@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:30:51 -0800
From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ashok.raj@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch] genapic: optimize & fix APIC mode setup
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:42:56PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> > Not really. That chipset belongs to a MP platform and with your
> > proposed patch, we will endup using clustered APIC mode and will hit
> > the issue(in the presence of cpu hotplug) mentioned in that URL.
>
> hm, why does it end up in clustered mode? Cluster mode should only
> trigger if the APIC IDs go beyond 16.
go beyond '8' not 16. With Dual-core+HT these MP platforms will have 16 logical
cpus.
>
> but i'd be fine with never going into cluster mode, instead always using
> physical flat mode when having more than 8 APICs (independent of the
> presence of CPU hotplug). On small systems, logical flat mode is what is
> the best-tested variant (it's also slightly faster).
Ok.
thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists