[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061113190452.GA29109@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:04:52 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ashok.raj@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch] genapic: optimize & fix APIC mode setup
* Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:42:56PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> > > Not really. That chipset belongs to a MP platform and with your
> > > proposed patch, we will endup using clustered APIC mode and will hit
> > > the issue(in the presence of cpu hotplug) mentioned in that URL.
> >
> > hm, why does it end up in clustered mode? Cluster mode should only
> > trigger if the APIC IDs go beyond 16.
>
> go beyond '8' not 16. With Dual-core+HT these MP platforms will have
> 16 logical cpus.
yes - then the APIC ids will go beyond 15.
> > but i'd be fine with never going into cluster mode, instead always
> > using physical flat mode when having more than 8 APICs (independent
> > of the presence of CPU hotplug). On small systems, logical flat mode
> > is what is the best-tested variant (it's also slightly faster).
>
> Ok.
ok, that's really good. Is there any 'weird' platform that you are aware
of that absolutely needs clustered APIC mode (because it has no physical
delivery mode or something)?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists