[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4558C3EB.1070400@openvz.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:13:47 +0300
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...nvz.org
Subject: [PATCH]: OOM can panic due to processes stuck in __alloc_pages()
OOM can panic due to the processes stuck in __alloc_pages()
doing infinite rebalance loop while no memory can be reclaimed.
OOM killer tries to kill some processes, but unfortunetaly,
rebalance label was moved by someone below the TIF_MEMDIE check,
so buddy allocator doesn't see that process is OOM-killed
and it can simply fail the allocation :/
Observed in reality on RHEL4(2.6.9)+OpenVZ kernel when a user doing
some memory allocation tricks triggered OOM panic.
Signed-Off-By: Denis Lunev <den@...ru>
Signed-Off-By: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>
--- ./mm/page_alloc.c.oomx 2006-11-08 17:44:16.000000000 +0300
+++ ./mm/page_alloc.c 2006-11-13 21:57:33.000000000 +0300
@@ -1251,6 +1251,7 @@ restart:
/* This allocation should allow future memory freeing. */
+rebalance:
if (((p->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) || unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE)))
&& !in_interrupt()) {
if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC)) {
@@ -1272,7 +1273,6 @@ nofail_alloc:
if (!wait)
goto nopage;
-rebalance:
cond_resched();
/* We now go into synchronous reclaim */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists