[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061114231742.GE7030@in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:17:42 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Reloc Kernel List <fastboot@...ts.osdl.org>,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, akpm@...l.org, ak@...e.de, hpa@...or.com,
magnus.damm@...il.com, lwang@...hat.com, dzickus@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 04:30:03PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > - Killed lots of dead code
> > - Improve the cpu sanity checks to verify long mode
> > is enabled when we wake up.
> > - Removed the need for modifying any existing kernel page table.
> > - Moved wakeup_level4_pgt into the wakeup routine so we can
> > run the kernel above 4G.
> > - Increased the size of the wakeup routine to 8K.
> > - Renamed the variables to use the 64bit register names.
> > - Lots of misc cleanups to match trampoline.S
> >
> > I don't have a configuration I can test this but it compiles cleanly
>
> Ugh, now that's a big patch.. and untested, too :-(.
>
> Why is PGE no longer required, for example?
>
> Can we get it piece-by-piece?
>
> > Vivek has tested this patch for suspend to memory and it works fine.
>
> Ok, so it was tested on one config. Given that the patch deals with
> detecting CPU oddities... :-(
Hi Pavel,
This code has been lying in RHEL kernels for close to 3 months now.
Have not heard of suspend/resume complaints. So hoping it got
tested on wide variety of hardware too apart from testing on my machine.
Thanks
Vivek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists