linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061114233936.GA3394@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:39:36 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Reloc Kernel List <fastboot@...ts.osdl.org>,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, akpm@...l.org, ak@...e.de, hpa@...or.com,
	magnus.damm@...il.com, lwang@...hat.com, dzickus@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup

Hi!

> > > Vivek has tested this patch for suspend to memory and it works fine.
> > 
> > Ok, so it was tested on one config. Given that the patch deals with
> > detecting CPU oddities... :-(
> 
> This code has been lying in RHEL kernels for close to 3 months now.
> Have not heard of suspend/resume complaints. So hoping it got
> tested on wide variety of hardware too apart from testing on my machine.

Well, unless you have some way to restore video in RHEL, I'd not
expect many users of suspend to RAM... On systems without extensive
whitelist, s2ram is fairly hard to test.

								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/