[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200611152026.26095.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 20:26:25 +0100
From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Cc: madwifi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, lwn@....net, mcgrof@...il.com,
david.kimdon@...icescape.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: SFLC helps developers assess ar5k (enabling free Atheros HAL)
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 20:21, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 07:42:14PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
>
> > Now that it seems to be ok to use these openbsd sources, should I port
> > them to my driver framework?
> > I looked over the ar5k code and, well, I don't like it. ;)
> > I don't really like having a HAL. I'd rather prefer a "real" driver
> > without that HAL obfuscation.
>
> I don't think anyone likes the HAL-based architecture. I don't think
> we will accept a HAL-based driver into the upstream kernel.
Yeah, wanted to hear that. ;)
> The point is that the ar5k is now safe to be used as a reference and
> source of information (and code, as appropriate) without copyright FUD.
> Distilling that information into a proper Linux driver is work that
> remains to be done.
Yeah, ok. I'll look what I can do. First I'll have to read the code.
and understand it. DMA stuff seems to be really obfuscated though
dozens of callbacks, heh. :)
--
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists