linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/20] x86_64: Relocatable bzImage (V3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:14:13 -0500
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Reloc Kernel List <fastboot@...ts.osdl.org>,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, akpm@...l.org, hpa@...or.com,
	magnus.damm@...il.com, lwang@...hat.com, dzickus@...hat.com,
	pavel@...e.cz, rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/20] x86_64: Relocatable bzImage (V3)

On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 09:52:02AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > - Fixed a bug during resume operation on machines which support NX bit.
> >
> > Your comments/suggestions are welcome.
> 
> The patches mostly look good to me. Lots of valuable cleanups too.
> 
> But they are clearly .21 material, needing much more testing.
> 
> I don't want to merge them before I have the .20 queue flushed
> because merging them right now would cause too much patch churn
> I think and it's better to do that once the main flood of .20
> patches is gone. So I would like to delay merging a bit until
> that happened.
> 
> Is that ok for you?

Hi Andi,

Yes that's fine with me. I will post a new series of patches once
you have flushed out the queue for .20

Thanks
Vivek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/