[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611191153200.3692@woody.osdl.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:54:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on
SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > because people point to the suspend-to-disk instead.
>
> Who they?
Like you _just_ did.
> > - enable PM_DEBUG, and PM_TRACE
>
> This only works on i386, no?
Right now the trivial functions are only available on i386, yes. The
concept works anywhere that has a CMOS chip, so if somebody were to spend
a few minutes testing it on x86-64 and others, it would work elsewhere
too..
> I don't know of anyone who's doing that.
I know. I'm probably the only one. Frustrating.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists