[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200611201017.19961.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:17:19 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [patch 2.6.19-rc6 1/6] rtc class /proc/driver/rtc update
Fix two minor botches in the procfs dumping of RTC alarm status:
- Stop confusing "alarm enabled" with "wakeup enabled".
- Don't display bogus "irq pending/un-acked" status; those are the rather
pointless semantics EFI assigned to this (for a no-IRQs environment).
The main RTC that seems confused about this is the sa1100 one, which
doesn't actually report whether it enabled the alarm.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Index: g26/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
===================================================================
--- g26.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c 2006-11-20 09:35:39.000000000 -0800
+++ g26/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c 2006-11-20 09:36:23.000000000 -0800
@@ -66,9 +66,11 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file
else
seq_printf(seq, "**\n");
seq_printf(seq, "alrm_wakeup\t: %s\n",
+ device_may_wakeup(class_dev->dev)
+ ? "yes" : "no");
+ seq_printf(seq, "alrm_enabled\t: %s\n",
alrm.enabled ? "yes" : "no");
- seq_printf(seq, "alrm_pending\t: %s\n",
- alrm.pending ? "yes" : "no");
+ /* alrm.pending ("irq un-acked") is useless ... */
}
seq_printf(seq, "24hr\t\t: yes\n");
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists