[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4562BD4E.20600@openvz.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:48:14 +0300
From: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] Fix locking on misrouted interrupts
Vivek noted that many places call note_interrupt()
without desc->lock being held. Since note_interrupt()
which tries to unlock this lock to handle spurious
interrupts accodring to
http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f72fa707604c015a6625e80f269506032d5430dc
Looking at note_interrupt() I found that desc->lock
IS required in this function but all the places that
call note_interrupt() lock it after the call. One
exception from this rule is __do_IRQ().
So I move spin_lock(&desc->lock); before calling
note_interrupt() in all places.
Signed-off-bt: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
View attachment "diff-note-interrupt-locking-fix" of type "text/plain" (2094 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists