[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4563A1E3.1030703@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:03:31 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: "Gaston, Jason D" <jason.d.gaston@...el.com>
CC: jgarzik@...ox.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc6] ata_piix: IDE mode SATA patch for Intel ICH9
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
> Did this come through ok, using Evolution, or do I need to try a
> different email client and send again?
It's wrapped and more comments below.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gaston, Jason D
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:52 PM
> To: jgarzik@...ox.com; linux-ide@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Gaston, Jason D
> Subject: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc6] ata_piix: IDE mode SATA patch for Intel ICH9
>
> This patch adds the Intel ICH9 IDE mode SATA controller DID's.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gaston <jason.d.gaston@...el.com>
>
> --- linux-2.6.19-rc6/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c.orig 2006-11-20
> 04:58:48.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.19-rc6/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c 2006-11-20
> 06:15:12.000000000 -0800
Above two lines are wrapped.
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@
> ich6_sata_ahci = 8,
> ich6m_sata_ahci = 9,
> ich8_sata_ahci = 10,
> + ich9_sata_ahci = 11,
AFAICS, ich9 isn't different from ich8. Any reason not to simply use
ich8_sata_ahci?
[--snip--]
> +static const struct piix_map_db ich9_map_db = {
> + .mask = 0x3,
> + .port_enable = 0x3,
> + .present_shift = 8,
I guess this patch is against libata-dev#upstream-fixes. Just FYI
.present_shift is gone in libata-dev#upstream.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists