[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200611212045.24581.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:45:22 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Andrew Victor <andrew@...people.com>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>, jamey.hicks@...com,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...sta.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 7:36 pm, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> I don't need to REmux, but I don't want to bother setting up the routing
> manually at all. I think the GPIO management stuff can do it properly
> on my behalf, given the information we have to acquire to get the GPIO
> API to work in the first place.
Yet requesting GPIO_62 still doesn't tell me I have to
update muxing for ball M7 or G20 ... and knowing that for
GPIOs doesn't go anywhere near knowing that for all the
other chip functions.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists