[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4563D651.50109@billgatliff.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:47:13 -0600
From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
CC: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Andrew Victor <andrew@...people.com>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>, jamey.hicks@...com,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...sta.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
David:
David Brownell wrote:
>On Tuesday 21 November 2006 7:36 pm, Bill Gatliff wrote:
>
>
>
>>I don't need to REmux, but I don't want to bother setting up the routing
>>manually at all. I think the GPIO management stuff can do it properly
>>on my behalf, given the information we have to acquire to get the GPIO
>>API to work in the first place.
>>
>>
>
>Yet requesting GPIO_62 still doesn't tell me I have to
>update muxing for ball M7 or G20
>
Which is why I was pushing you to define a GPIO62M7 enumeration!
> ... and knowing that for
>GPIOs doesn't go anywhere near knowing that for all the
>other chip functions.
>
>
True, but we've got to start somewhere! :)
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
bgat@...lgatliff.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists