linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix build without HOTPLUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:17:00 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Reuben Farrelly <reuben-linuxkernel@...b.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix build without HOTPLUG_CPU (was Re:
 2.6.19-rc6-mm1)

On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > cpu_vsyscall_notifier() is defined only when CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is 
> > defined.
> It's already long fixed in Linus' tree (in 
> 6b3d1a95ba714bfb1cc81362f7f3e01b7654b4f3) I wonder why that didn't 
> makeit into Andrew's. Andrew, time to update your linus-patch?

Well, is it really? 6b3d1a95ba714bfb1cc81362f7f3e01b7654b4f3 adds the 
ifdef around the cpu_vsyscall_notifier() declaration, but later it's 
passed as parameter to hotcpu_notifier() unconditionally. This is fixed by 
the patch I sent.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/