[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440611222216u629835fepe2a39d4d34d9fefb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:16:07 -0800
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai.lu@....com>
To: "Auke Kok" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox" <matthew@....cx>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Hidetoshi Seto" <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
"Linux Kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>,
"Grant Grundler" <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"Kenji Kaneshige" <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] e1000 : Make Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free
On 11/22/06, Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> wrote:
> I think we want to condense the USE_IOPORT flag together with the other hardware
two cases
1. the IO port is not allocated by firmware, but
pci_assign_unassigned_resources will get that allocated.
2. the IO port is allocated by firmware, the bar will be retrieved by
pcibios_resource_survey.
so acctully the device already get the bar allocated in any case.
So what the purpose of this patch? the /poc/ioports hide ioport for the driver?
It seems need to add some pci_quirk to clear the bar for 2, and skip
the resource allocation for 1.
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists