[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <456AEB70.2000100@indt.org.br>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:43:12 -0400
From: Anderson Briglia <anderson.briglia@...t.org.br>
To: ext Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
CC: "Linux-omap-open-source@...ux.omap.com"
<linux-omap-open-source@...ux.omap.com>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
"Aguiar Carlos (EXT-INdT/Manaus)" <carlos.aguiar@...t.org.br>,
ext David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
"Lizardo Anderson (EXT-INdT/Manaus)" <anderson.lizardo@...t.org.br>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/5] [RFC] Add MMC Password Protection (lock/unlock) support
V7: mmc_omap_dma.diff
ext Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Anderson Briglia wrote:
>> OMAP platform specific patch.
>> - Adjust the frame size for DMA transfers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anderson Briglia <anderson.briglia <at> indt.org.br>
>> Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Aguiar <carlos.aguiar <at> indt.org.br>
>>
>
> This looks like a generic patch for OMAP and shouldn't be in this set.
This patch is needed only for lock/unlock commands. So, it's necessary to
make MMC omap works when using that feature. It's not a generic patch.
But I can take off this one from the series and send after (if) the series
is integrated.
>
>> Index: linux-omap-2.6.git/drivers/mmc/omap.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-omap-2.6.git.orig/drivers/mmc/omap.c 2006-11-22
>> 09:07:25.000000000 -0400
>> +++ linux-omap-2.6.git/drivers/mmc/omap.c 2006-11-22
>> 09:19:03.000000000 -0400
>> @@ -629,6 +629,14 @@ mmc_omap_prepare_dma(struct mmc_omap_hos
>>
>> data_addr = host->phys_base + OMAP_MMC_REG_DATA;
>> frame = data->blksz;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_PASSWORDS
>> + /* MMC LOCK/UNLOCK: Do frame size multiple of two. This is
>> + * needed for DMA transfers to work properly, once
>> + * the block size depends on MMC password length.
>> + */
>> + frame += frame&0x1;
>> +#endif
>> count = sg_dma_len(sg);
>>
>> if ((data->blocks == 1) && (count > (data->blksz)))
>>
>
> Now this you're going to have to explain to me. Especially the part
> where why this is specific to the lock commands.
frame depends on data->blksz. When we were using data->blksz_bits everything was
ok because we always had a multiple of 16 bits (2 bytes). Once a pwd can has a size
not multiple of 2, the value must be rounded.
According to MMC OMAP Technical Reference Manual, because of each DMA transfer is of
equal size, it is necessary to have the block size of the transfer be a multiple of
the DMA write access size (which is 2 bytes).
I'm not a DMA expert, If I misunderstand something, please, correct me.
Best Regards,
Anderson Briglia
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists