[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061127133748.4ebcd6b3.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:37:48 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel McNeil <daniel@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs : reorder some 'struct inode' fields to speedup
i_size manipulations
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:57:29 +0100
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:
> On 32bits SMP platforms, 64bits i_size is protected by a seqcount
> (i_size_seqcount).
>
> When i_size is read or written, i_size_seqcount is read/written as well, so it
> make sense to group these two fields together in the same cache line.
>
> Before this patch, accessing i_size needed 3 cache lines (2 for i_size, one
> for i_size_seqcount). After, only one cache line is needed/ (dirtied on a
> i_size change).
I didn't understand that paragraph at all, really, so I took it out.
At present an i_size change will dirty one, two or three cachelines, most
likely one or two.
After your patch an i_size change will dirty one or two cachelines, most
likely one.
yes?
> This patch moves i_size_seqcount next to i_size, and also moves i_version to
> let offsetof(struct inode, i_size) being 0x40 instead of 0x3c (for 32bits
> platforms).
>
> For 64 bits platforms, i_size_seqcount doesnt exist, and the move of a 'long
> i_version' should not introduce a new hole because of padding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists