[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <456B5E04.50007@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:52:04 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs : reorder some 'struct inode' fields to speedup i_size
manipulations
Andrew Morton a écrit :
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:57:29 +0100
> Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:
>
>> On 32bits SMP platforms, 64bits i_size is protected by a seqcount
>> (i_size_seqcount).
>>
>> When i_size is read or written, i_size_seqcount is read/written as well, so it
>> make sense to group these two fields together in the same cache line.
>>
>> Before this patch, accessing i_size needed 3 cache lines (2 for i_size, one
>> for i_size_seqcount). After, only one cache line is needed/ (dirtied on a
>> i_size change).
>
> I didn't understand that paragraph at all, really, so I took it out.
>
> At present an i_size change will dirty one, two or three cachelines, most
> likely one or two.
>
> After your patch an i_size change will dirty one or two cachelines, most
> likely one.
>
> yes?
nope
Before :
---------
offsetof(i_size) = 0x3C
i_size is 8 bytes, so i_size spans 2 cache lines (if 64 or 32 bytes cache lines)
and offsetof(i_size_seqcount) = 0x160, so a read of i_size (coupled with a
read of seqcount) needed 3 cache lines. A change of i_size dirtied 2 or 3
cache lines.
After :
--------
offsetof(i_size) = 0x40
offsetof(i_size_seqcount) = 0x48
One cache line 'only', reading or writing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists