lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:52:04 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs : reorder some 'struct inode' fields to speedup i_size
 manipulations

Andrew Morton a écrit :
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:57:29 +0100
> Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 32bits SMP platforms, 64bits i_size is protected by a seqcount 
>> (i_size_seqcount).
>>
>> When i_size is read or written, i_size_seqcount is read/written as well, so it 
>> make sense to group these two fields together in the same cache line.
>>
>> Before this patch, accessing i_size needed 3 cache lines (2 for i_size, one 
>> for i_size_seqcount). After, only one cache line is needed/ (dirtied on a 
>> i_size change).
> 
> I didn't understand that paragraph at all, really, so I took it out.
> 
> At present an i_size change will dirty one, two or three cachelines, most
> likely one or two.
> 
> After your patch an i_size change will dirty one or two cachelines, most
> likely one.
> 
> yes?

nope

Before :
---------
  offsetof(i_size) = 0x3C

i_size is 8 bytes, so i_size spans 2 cache lines (if 64 or 32 bytes cache lines)

and offsetof(i_size_seqcount) = 0x160, so a read of i_size (coupled with a 
read of seqcount) needed 3 cache lines. A change of i_size dirtied 2 or 3 
cache lines.


After :
--------
offsetof(i_size) = 0x40
offsetof(i_size_seqcount) = 0x48

One cache line 'only', reading or writing.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ